Loylogic announced on June 9, 2026 that it would participate in the IMA Europe conference in Copenhagen two days later. Its preview put gift card fraud alongside personalised rewards and practical uses of artificial intelligence. [S01]

The company argued that protecting accumulated loyalty value belongs in the same conversation as making redemption easier. Its statement described priorities for an industry meeting, rather than a new fraud product or evidence of a measured reduction in losses. [S01]

The meeting and the message

IMA Europe listed the Danish Film Institute as the venue for its June 11 conference, with a programme running from 9am to 7pm and presentations in English. The organiser positioned the gathering as a forum for incentive professionals to exchange ideas and develop industry relationships. [S02]

Scroll left or right to see all columns
The meeting and the message

Item

Verified detail

Company announcement

June 9, 2026

Scheduled conference

June 11, 2026

Location

Danish Film Institute, Copenhagen

Company’s stated focus

Relevant rewards, practical AI and protection against gift card fraud

The company date and priorities come from Loylogic; the event details come from IMA Europe. The preview is not a record of what speakers ultimately presented or what delegates concluded. [S01][S02]

Choice is only part of the rewards experience

Loylogic favoured rewards that reflect members’ interests and daily lives over reliance on generic discounts. It also described predictive technology as a way to match rewards to individual profiles. These are the provider’s strategic positions; its preview supplied no evaluation of the technology or comparative performance figures. [S01]

For a gift card programme, a broader catalogue and a safer redemption process answer different questions. More choice can give a recipient a reason to use a balance. Controls determine whether that value reaches the intended recipient. A programme cannot establish the quality of either part simply by counting available brands.

The practical editorial takeaway is to examine personalisation and protection together. Relevant evidence would include successful redemption, customer effort and losses, each with a defined period and population. That would let buyers distinguish an attractive rewards proposition from a demonstrated operational improvement. The Copenhagen preview frames that discussion but does not provide those measurements.